9 feet Giant Indian Mummy
A JlailitT’s Museum.
Several weeks ago the dime museumon Dccatur street was levied upon by Bailiff Barucs, of Judge Edgar Orr’s Court, by virtue of an attachment sued
out by Mrs. M. A. Hughes against Ed.Reedy. Reedy was manager of the museum.
The several curiosities constituting the museum were moved to Judge Orr’s courtroom after the levy, where they have been ever since. They have been viewed by many people since they have been at Judge Orr’s, as a peep at the museum there is free.
The most interesting part of the
museum is the mummified body of a giant Indian. The Indian must have been at least nine feet tall in life.
The body, drawn as it is, measures within a few inches of nine feet now. It has been pronounced by some as in a state of partial petrifaction, but it
has since been pronounced by high authorities in osteology as a genuine mummy. The flesh on the huge skele?ton is very dry, too dry for petrifac? tion, and in some places the skeleton is almost bare. The mummified body of the Indian is lying in a perfectly natural position. lie lies in the long green box, prepared for the purpose, with his long, coarse hair covering the pillow as if he were asleep. It is like a giant warrior had laid himself down to sleep. Even through the rough, dry muscle-like flesh drawn tightly over the bones of his face, there is discernable a fierce look of courage, such as might be imagined agiant like he would possess. The huge frame is
well proportioned, considering that it is so large.
The claim account for which the
attachment was taken, not having been settled, the property has been legally advertised for sale on next
.Monday at 12 o’clock. The curiosi?ties advertised are the giaut Indian mummy, a baby mummy and a double
The baby mummy itself is an inter?esting study. It is an Indian baby in mummified state tightly incased in a split log with an ancient looking hatchet cleaving its little head. It is supposed that the baby was murdered, possibly by the big giant, and put in? side the hollow of a tree, where the baby became mummified.
The advertisement has attracted che attention of the Smithsonian institu?tion doctors and professors and that institution has sent several ostcologists at different times to make an ex?pert examination of the mummies
First Dr. Priorlcau and Professor
Steele, of the Smithsonian institution, came and made an expert examination
of the bodies represented to the mum?mies. After a long and careful exam?ination they pronounced them as realmummified bodies. The giant mum?my, they said, was 500 or perhaps1,000 years old. They said its mum?
mified state was due to a peculiar ac?cident. The bodies became mummi?
fied in a peculiarly dry atmosphere,they said.
Professor Lucas was the last of the Smithsonian institution professors to
come and examine the mummies. He made an expert examination with powerful glasses and in many other ways and he also pronounced the bod?
ies to be in a real mummified state. The examinations were made with
the intention of purchasing the mum? mies to put in the National museum
Copies of the advertisement rif the sale were taken by the professors of the National museum and it is expect? ed that representatives of the institu?
tion at Washington will be present at the sale of the museum next Monday
tu bid for it.
All of the experts who have exam?ined the giant mummy, which is near?
ly nine feet in length, think it is a curiosity fit t<> be placed in the Na?
tional museum.?Atlanta Constitution.
The Anderson intelligencer. (Anderson Court House, S.C.) 1860-1914, December 04, 1895, Image 1
Agent Smith: You hear that Mr. Anderson?… That is the sound of inevitability… It is the sound of your death… Goodbye, Mr. Anderson…
Best regards from Germany
Perfect quote i thought. This article being from the Anderson Intelligecer/Mr. Anderson? huh? . . . ok.
Here your average every day giant-indian-mummy taller than Robert Wadlow, which is quite common in fact. The story leads to the Smithsonian Institution which is also quite common. Here you have specific names and the result of their “peer-review” <throws up>
Pointing out this in this article of course makes me a “conspirator”, . . . ah no.
Seeing that it wasn’t me that wrote this article in 1895!!!, and that people were indeed smarter in the past. (observe the world you live in now )
What i am doing is pointing out the corruption in 1895 of the Smithsonian Institution. Not today, however, why is the Smithsonian not releasing this information today? The simple answer is evolutionism is the mandatory government religion, a Federal belief system based on pantheism. The theory of evolutionism simply cannot survive without government sponsorship and why are the agencies like the Smithsonian cherry-picking the evidence?
~Chris L Lesley