Very Strong Men From England
It seems that there are recognizable traits and features that distinguishes tribes of giants. What is referred as the Neanderthal skull which has a larger brain capacity than humans today. They have thick brows a low sweeping forehead and the back part of the skull enlarged greatly. Another is te coneheaded type like the skulls from Peru. These types have been found all over the world and have been mimicked by banding of the skull. Some of the elongated skulls are not the result of banding.
- The individuals known as the long-headed men may be from the egyptian culture of the pharoahs known to have long skulls. These may be the beaker culture or what is known as the men of the battleaxe.
- The broad headed men may be the Neanderthal type having large foreheads and associated with Britain. It is said that this culture possess large robust skeletons and are known for their large brow ridges. From which the origin of these people might be traced back to the Polish origins of Galicia.
The intermingling and breeding practices make it hard to trace specific tribes, but i guess skull shapes might be the best way with historical verification backing up the claims. Politics it seems to always be at war with history, and the losers, and minorities have their histories rewritten. The problem is no kingdom lasts so with each successive lost previous history always seems to be rewritten. The races and cultures of the word suffer from selective memory it seems that the living does not have the answers, and the only truth is silently spoken from honest anthropological and paleontological pursuits.
~Chris L Lesley
In the year 1994 the bones of a giant man 7 feet tall, and a woman over 6 feet tall were found near Thirsk Castle, England. Evidently a population of “Saxon giants” once lived in the area:
http://www.thirskmuseum.org/giant.htm
http://yorkshire.greatbritishlife.co.uk/article/thirsk-enter-a-land-of-giants-and-curses-and-re-discover-this-north-yorkshire-market-town-22860/
“Archaeologist Demands Respect for Giants’ Bones
Bones pointing to the existence of a community of “Saxon giants” in north Yorkshire go on display next month despite a protest from the archaeologist who found them.
The part-skeletons are an extraordinary find. Dug up from a sixth-century Saxon cemetery discovered beneath the ruins of Thirsk Castle, they indicate a seven-foot-tall man and a woman more than six feet in height. A number of children were also buried there.
“These bones could explain why there are quite a number of hefty Yorkshiremen about,” said Cooper Harding, curator at Thirsk Museum, where the remains will be displayed.
“You can imagine the terror of the native Celtic farmers, who were quite short, when confronted by these giants.”
But Leslie Webster, a curator at the British Museum, specialising in the early Anglo-Saxon period, said last night: “Saxons were not particularly tall. These bones are certainly not normal. It would not be a normal height for any period of British history.”
The cemetery was discovered by archaeologist Anne Finney five years ago by pure chance during a routine dig among the castle ramparts. But the artefacts have been kept hidden from the public, stored in vaults and seen only by academics. Ms Finney, who runs a firm called Map Archaeological Consultancy, handed them over to the Yorkshire Archaeological Trust.
Thirsk Museum lobbied intensely for the bones and items of jewellery – including a stunning bronze cruciform brooch and early Saxon pottery – to be handed over and put on public display. It finally won after a five-year battle.
But Ms Finney is unhappy with the museum’s plans. “It was a very good find. But the bones should not be on display. You should treat human remains with reverence.”
Mr Harding said: “Our display will be restrained and thoughtful. But as you can see, it is the bones which capture the interest of the public.”
[Source: The Independent / London / By Robert Mendick – March 12 2000 ]
Notice the article from “The Independent” candidly admits: “But the artefacts have been kept hidden from the public, stored in vaults and seen only by academics.” Yes, giants are kept hidden from the public. If they are hiding the remains of 7 foot giants, god only knows how many 8, 9, 10, and 11 foot giants are being “stored in vaults” and seen “only by academics.” And the excuse that they were hiding them because they wanted to “respect the remains” is about as legitimate as saying they want to “respect the remains” of Kennewick man, and all the other discoveries which turn conventional archaeology on its head. Yet at the same time, there are museums all over the world displaying the remains of Neanderthal and small stature alleged “ape men”. The truth is, giants are being kept hidden, as are all other finds which proven ancient myths and histories of old are not bunk but founded in real nuggets of truth. Maybe monsters are real after all, and science is scared to death, plus the fact that the Bible might be true, and that accountablility to the creator may also be true…. that’s REALLY scary!
The ramifications are paradigm shattering — hence, they stuff giants in giant closets. That’s my opinion anyways.
They pathetically try to say “They don’t want to show us “Real Giants” to respect the remains”! What? The same respect they showed for Egyptian,Greek, Nth & Sth American Indian burial sites or a Thousand other disrespectful get rich archaeological crimes committed by the rich/elites who sponsored them, many of them were British too.